HaProzdor
"LaZuz min haProzdorim! Higi'a z'man t'fillah..."
Monday, October 08, 2007
Disclaimers
Nothing on this site should be taken as halacha l'ma'aseh. To the contrary, by reading this blog you are implicitly agreeing to point out anything that is halachically incorrect. The sources that I make use of will almost always be uncited due to the difficulty that I have in remembering where I saw something, but I will try to provide as much information as I remember. I do not accept any responsibility for bittul z'man that results from reading this blog except for my own - if you have something to do that's more worthwhile, log off your computer and go out and do it!Previous Posts
- A response to "The Symbolic Violence of Vegetables"
- Ki Tavo 2 - Baruch atah b'vo'echa
- Elul 1 - Thoughts on Car Design and Brisker Mussar
- Rosh HaShanah 2 - Kavod Tzibbur
- Pirkei Avos - Kol Yisroel
- Standing for the Chosson and Kallah at a Wedding
- Tish'a B'Av 2 - Kara alai mo'eid
- Life is Autocatalytic
- Pinchas 2 - Trivia
- Balak 2 - Telegraph
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
5 Comments:
sheratzim, no?
I should have included the word "live" in my post, as even besides dead sheratzim, dead animals are subject to the laws of tum'as ma'achal. I made the change.
Live animals cannot become tamei.
Furthermore, you're asking about the laws of tumah and taharah in a time when such laws were unknown and not kept.
The Wolf
Yes. But in certain obscure cases, they *can* be m'kablim tum'a. For example, see Eiruvin 1:7, which states that if one uses a living animal as a golel (I forget exactly what this is - perhaps a headstone for a grave?), it is m'tamei mishum ohel. IIRC, this tum'a persists even if the animal is then released from being used as a golel.
This tum'a would ostensibly apply *even nowadays*, in that a kohen would be oveir a lav if he were to be in the same building as this golel-animal. The connection to P' No'ach was tangential, and not part of the question.
OK, Kollel Iyun HaDaf brings down a three way machlokes as to the identity of the golel on their Background to the Daf page for Kesubos 4b:
* Rashi, Tos', Aruch, and Or Zarua hold that the golel is the cover of a coffin.
* Rabbeinu Tam holds that the golel is the gravestone.
* R' Moshe quoted in Or Zarua holds that the golel is the stone used as a door to a burial vault.
Hence, if one used a live animal for a golel, it would be tamei mishum ohel like the mais itself.
Post a Comment
<< Home